IPReg Consultation on the Patent Examinations

As many of you know, in early 2014, IPReg asked the patent profession for comments on its proposals to ‘simplify and modernise the Patent Attorney examination system’.  (See our summary blog post on this matter).  IPReg has now provided an update on the matter.

IPReg states in their update:
We received a large number of responses, some of which were very detailed, and I should like to thank you for taking the time to participate in the consultation.

 Following our own internal review of the responses, IPReg decided to commission external research about teaching, learning and assessment in the context of professions, in order to inform our discussions about ‘next steps’. That research was undertaken by staff at the Institute of Education/UCL. Their report has set out for us some of the key issues based on published and accepted practice in teaching, learning and assessment.

 As well as this report, the consultation responses provided us with a range of views as well as a significant number of responses expressing reservations about the proposed changes. IPReg’s Education, Qualifications, Conduct and Disciplinary Committee (EQCD) has agreed that it is now prudent for us to take a period of time to carefully consider the report and the feedback before reaching a conclusion about whether or not to make any changes.

 Therefore, I should like to confirm that there will be no change to the current arrangements for patent examinations for the next two examination cycles and, as we have said before, any future changes would always be subject to appropriate transition arrangements to ensure that trainees are not prejudiced” (emphasis added).

Thus, it appears that for the time being, no changes are being made to the patent attorney qualification process.

It also appears that changes to the qualification process may still be on the cards.  The IPReg Board’s meeting minutes of March 2015 (see here) state that the Board is considering whether and how certain university courses should be accredited (i.e. the courses which exempt trainees from the PEB Foundation exams).  In particular, the Board states that “there was a need to have a health warning/disclaimer on the [accreditation] report as students were paying for expensive courses that might not necessarily lead to a job” (emphasis added).

We look forward to hearing what IPReg decides on this matter soon.

Parminder
Informals’ Honorary Secretary

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “IPReg Consultation on the Patent Examinations

  1. Hi Anon of 13:21

    If you mean the report produced by the Institute of Education/UCL, I have no idea. I haven’t seen it, and it doesn’t appear to be on the IPReg website, and it wasn’t distributed with this update. I can try to get a copy though…

    Parminder

  2. Yes please! I think it would be interesting to see what the “key issues” are considered to be, although it wouldn’t surprise me if they didn’t wish to disclose it.

  3. Pingback: Survey on possible changes to qualification system for patent attorneys – your views needed! | The Yellow Sheet

File a Response

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s